© The Guardian
13 January 2004
Councillors with masonic links
will in future be forced to declare their membership in order to
avoid conflicts of interest in town hall decision-making.
The Standards
Board for England
decision potentially ends a two-year tussle under the new code
of conduct over freemasons who stand as councillors.
When the code was first
introduced in April 2001, an argument erupted over whether
elected councillors should be made to reveal their freemasonry
on the register of interests.
The matter was subsequently
left to local authorities, which have the powers to strengthen
the code locally. Some councils decided to introduce this
requirement, while others declined.
There are 300,000 freemasons in
England and Wales, although the number of councillors who belong
to the organisation remains unknown.
The standards board has now
issued guidance confirming that membership of the Freemasons
must regularly be declared under the councillors' code of
conduct, under the auspice of its charitable activities.
Under the code councillors must
disclose their charity membership on the register of interests.
The guidance was issued after
the united grand lodge admitted that part of freemasons' annual
subscription fee to their lodges goes to the Freemasons' Grand
Charity, which ranks as the second biggest charity donor, second
only to the national lottery.
The standards board issued a
statement which states: "Freemasons must register
membership of their freemason lodge on the register of interests
and, where appropriate, declare their membership as a personal
or prejudicial interest before, or during, council
meetings."
The
United Grand Lodge retorted
by accusing the standards watchdog of singling out its members.
UGL media manager and grand
officer Chris Connop, said: "It is more a matter of
principle and the fact that we are being singled out and being
targeted. There are other organisations that are not being
mentioned. You do not have to declare the golf club you belong
to, yet a lot gets decided on golf courses. We think this is
based on ignorance and prejudice and a misunderstanding of what
freemasons stand for.
"When we become
freemasons, we promise we will not use our membership for
professional or financial gain. We can get thrown out for doing
it."
A legal challenge had not been
ruled out, he added. "This has never been tested in
court," he said. "I certainly do not think this is
something we would let rest."